download your AI debate coach

Surveillance Topic: Law Reviews

 

  1. Copyright (c) 2013 Arizona Board of Regents Arizona Law Review, 2013, Arizona Law Review, 55 Ariz. L. Rev. 997, 10598 words, ARTICLE: PRIVACY PROTESTS: SURVEILLANCE EVASION AND FOURTH AMENDMENT SUSPICION, Elizabeth E. Joh *
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 The Trustees of Boston University The Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, Summer, 2014, The Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 23 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 343, 23745 words, NOTE: BIG BROTHER’S GROWN WINGS: THE DOMESTIC PROLIFERATION OF DRONE SURVEILLANCE AND THE LAW’S RESPONSE, Y. Douglas Yang*
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 California Law Review. All Rights Reserved. California Law Review Circuit, May, 2014, California Law Review Circuit, 5 Calif. L. Rev. Circuit 259, 3047 words, ARTICLE: To Unseal or Not to Unseal: The Judiciary’s Role in Preventing Transparency in Electronic Surveillance Applications and Orders, Brian L. Owsley *
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 Duke University Law School. All Rights Reserved. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar, 2013, Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar, 8 Duke J. Const. Law & PP Sidebar 51, 11483 words, ARTICLE: CLAPPER V. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: WHO HAS STANDING TO CHALLENGE GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE?, ELISA SIELSKI *
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Fordham University School of Law Fordham International Law Journal, April, 2014, Fordham International Law Journal, 37 Fordham Int’l L.J. 733, 16444 words, NOTE: I SPY WITH MY NOT SO LITTLE EYE: A COMPARISON OF SURVEILLANCE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES AND NEW ZEALAND, Valerie Redmond *
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Fordham Law Review Fordham Law Review, April, 2014, Fordham Law Review, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 2137, 16617 words, SYMPOSIUM: CITIZENSHIP, IMMIGRATION, AND NATIONAL SECURITY AFTER 9/11: THE NSA IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: SURVEILLANCE, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND INTERNATIONAL COUNTERTERRORISM, Peter Margulies*
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Georgetown Law Journal Georgetown Law Journal, August, 2014, Georgetown Law Journal, 102 Geo. L.J. 1721, 10385 words, ARTICLE: Panvasive Surveillance, Political Process Theory, and the Nondelegation Doctrine, CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN *
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Harvard Society for Law & Public Policy, Inc. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Summer, 2014, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 37 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 901, 13925 words, ARTICLE: THE LEGALITY OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY’S BULK DATA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS, JOHN YOO *
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 President and Fellows of Harvard College Harvard Journal on Legislation, Summer, 2014, Harvard Journal on Legislation, 51 Harv. J. on Legis. 365, 12171 words, NOTE*: THE POWER TO APPOINT FISA JUDGES: EVALUATING LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO REFORM 50 U.S.C. ß 1803 AND IMPROVE THE SURVEILLANCE COURT
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 Harvard Law Review Association Harvard Law Review, May, 2013, Harvard Law Review, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1934, 17298 words, SYMPOSIUM: PRIVACY AND TECHNOLOGY: THE DANGERS OF SURVEILLANCE, Neil M. Richards*
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 Howard University School of Law Howard Law Journal, Fall, 2013, Howard Law Journal, 57 How. L.J. 433, 15710 words, NOTE AND COMMENT: National Security Surveillance on the Basis of Race, Ethnicity, and Religion: A Constitutional Misstep, Cindy C. Unegbu*
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 The John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law, Summer, 2014, The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 795, 10357 words, COMMENT: WHERE HAS PRIVACY GONE? HOW SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS THREATEN EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY, MICHAEL GREENE *
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Loyola Law Review, Winter, 2013, Loyola Law Review, 59 Loy. L. Rev. 861, 38343 words, ARTICLE: NSA SURVEILLANCE SINCE 9/11 AND THE HUMAN RIGHT TO PRIVACY, G. Alex Sinha*
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 University of Maine School of Law Maine Law Review, 2014, Maine Law Review, 66 Me. L. Rev. 487, 10514 words, ARTICLE: PRIVACY AND SECURITY IN THE CLOUD: SOME REALISM ABOUT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS TO TRANSNATIONAL SURVEILLANCE IN THE POST-SNOWDEN ERA +, Joris V.J. van Hoboken * and Ira S. Rubinstein **
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 New England School of Law New England Law Review, Fall, 2013, New England Law Review, 48 New Eng. L. Rev. 55, 21898 words, ARTICLE: Standing Up to Clapper: How to Increase Transparency and Oversight of FISA Surveillance, Alan Butler*
  1. Copyright (c) 2012 New York University Law Review New York University Law Review, December, 2012, New York University Law Review, 87 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1950, 18292 words, NOTE: OVERLY INTIMATE SURVEILLANCE: WHY EMERGENT PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS DESERVE STRICT SCRUTINY UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, Margaret B. Hoppin*
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Board of Trustees, for Northern Illinois University Northern Illinois University Law Review, Summer, 2014, Northern Illinois University Law Review, 34 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 643, 10313 words, ARTICLE: Modern Private Data Collection and National Security Agency Surveillance: A Comprehensive Package of Solutions Addressing Domestic Surveillance Concerns, SHAINA KALANGES *
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 The Ohio State University Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, Ohio State Law Journal, 74 Ohio St. L.J. 1071, 17146 words, SYMPOSIUM: The Second Wave of Global Privacy Protection: Modern Safeguards for Modern Surveillance: An Analysis of Innovations in Communications Surveillance Techniques, Gus Hosein* & Caroline Wilson Palow+
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 The Ohio State University Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, Ohio State Law Journal, 74 Ohio St. L.J. 1105, 27386 words, SYMPOSIUM: The Second Wave of Global Privacy Protection: Immigration Policing and Federalism Through the Lens of Technology, Surveillance, and Privacy, Anil Kalhan*
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Oklahoma Law Review Oklahoma Law Review, Summer, 2014, Oklahoma Law Review, 66 Okla. L. Rev. 725, 10050 words, SYMPOSIUM: Law Enforcement Access to Third Party Records: CAUSE TO BELIEVE WHAT? THE IMPORTANCE OF DEFINING A SEARCH’S OBJECT–OR, HOW THE ABA WOULD ANALYZE THE NSA METADATA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM, CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN *
  1. Copyright (c) 2012 St. Thomas Law Review St. Thomas Law Review, Spring, 2012, St. Thomas Law Review, 24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 169, 43557 words, CRIMINAL LAW ISSUE: FEATURED CONTRIBUTOR: SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND THE LOSS OF SOMETHING A LOT LIKE PRIVACY: AN EXAMINATION OF THE “MOSAIC THEORY” AND THE LIMITS OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, Courtney E. Walsh n1
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Wake Forest Law Review Association, Inc. Wake Forest Law Review, Summer, 2014, Wake Forest Law Review, 49 Wake Forest L. Rev. 485, 19981 words, ESSAY: FAILING EXPECTATIONS: FOURTH AMENDMENT DOCTRINE IN THE ERA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE, Olivier Sylvain
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Wake Forest Law Review Association, Inc. Wake Forest Law Review, Summer, 2014, Wake Forest Law Review, 49 Wake Forest L. Rev. 583, 12578 words, ESSAY: THE DATA SURVEILLANCE STATE IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE, Joel R. Reidenberg*
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 Whittier Law Review Whittier Law Review, Spring, 2014, Whittier Law Review, 35 Whittier L. Rev. 559, 16088 words, NOTE AND COMMENT: CLAPPER V. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: THE “CERTAINLY IMPENDING” STANDARD FOR ARTICLE III STANDING IN GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE CASES, Caspar S. Miller
  1. Copyright (c) 2013 Yale Journal of Law & Technology Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 2013 – 2014, Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 16 Yale J. L. & Tech. 134, 10680 words, ARTICLE: A LOT MORE THAN A PEN REGISTER, AND LESS THAN A WIRETAP: n1 WHAT THE STINGRAY TEACHES US ABOUT HOW CONGRESS SHOULD APPROACH THE REFORM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITIES n2, Stephanie K. Pell * & Christopher Soghoian **
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 by the Oregon State Bar The Oregon State Bar Bulletin, February/March, 2014, 74 Or. St. B. Bull. 19, 2496 words, FEATURE: WHAT NSA SURVEILLANCE MEANS TO LAW FIRMS: WHAT LAWYERS TODAY NEED TO KNOW ABOUT CYBER SECURITY, By Sharon D. Nelson & John W. Simek
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 American Bar Association Administrative Law Review, Spring 2014, 66 ADMIN. L. REV. 409, 27913 words, COMMENT RUBBER-STAMPING: LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE, AND JUDICIAL RESPONSES TO CRITIQUES OF THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT ONE YEAR AFTER THE 2013 NSA LEAKS, MICHAEL T. FRANCEL *
  1. Copyright (c) 2014 American Bar Association Litigation, Spring, 2014, 40 Litigation 40, FEATURE   FISA AUTHORITY AND BLANKET SURVEILLANCE   A GATEKEEPER WITHOUT OPPOSITION, Jacob Sommer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recent Posts